Aspen Lodge Expansion Update

Re-Printed with permission of Michael Ferrell – Del Webb Owner

Here is an update on Lodge Expansion. The Sierra Canyon/Del Webb Facilities Committee (Glenda Powell Chairwoman, John Imsdahl, Jim McKee, Doug Wilson, Maryann McKinley, Harold Allred) work on Lodge Expansion continues, but has slowed a little.  It appears the matter will on the Board’s agenda for their May meeting at the earliest but more likely at the June meeting, and not April’s.

There are a lot of comprehensive details being looked into. It appears the Committee would like to line up all its ducks in a row before all Sierra Canyon Association (DW) members (Lot owners) will vote. This is so owners are asked to vote up or down only once. The Committee doesn’t want to have to “go to the well” repeatedly as the more times votes are asked for the less likely passage.

Only one owner per Lot can vote; and yes, Pulte will be able to vote the Lots they are paying dues on.

So far only one construction company has been contacted for a bid. I don’t know if an actual bid was requested or the company, K-7 Construction, was simply “brought in” as they had done the West Entry in 2014 and 2015. However, it appears they are only company the Committee, primarily the chair, has talked with so far.  The plan is to get two additional bids in order to obtain the best overall price and terms. However, to do this, architectural drawings would have to be drawn up with specifications and not just ask companies to bid on a concept drawing as the 500 Footers did. Such detailed drawings could cost thousands (even up to $60,000) in order for bidding companies to respond accurately.

The problem is it could be a waste of $$$ to have the drawings done, get more bids, and then have Lodge Expansion voted down by us DW owners. (Note: some construction companies have their own in-house design department.) So the plan is to get the Lodge Expansion voted on before spending this sizeable sum, but then owners would be asked to approve Lodge Expansion without knowing exactly what they are voting on and all the numerous related costs.

Speaking of $60,000, the Committee wants to hire a knowledgeable/experienced person at that price to oversee the project as a Construction Manager.

The cost being talked about with K-7 is $1.1 million, but this is without detailed architectural drawings so the project cost could and probably would change.  Other than the Committee no one knows what the $1.1M includes (Flooring? Window/door glass? Soundproofing? Sound system? Lighting? Outdoor umbrellas? Tables? Chairs? Kitchen appliances? Landscaping? Shades? Molding? Wallpaper? Room dividers? Etc. Etc. Etc.

The K-7 bid for the West Entry was $63,229 and their final cost was $93,590, i.e. 48% over bid. In addition to K-7’s cost other costs, including design work and glass, amounted to $14,197, putting the total cost for the West Entry at $107,787 – 70% above what owners thought, plus subsequent outdoor lighting and landscaping. AND DW didn’t get the window in the west entry that they voted for. Also, DW owners voted for a new revolving front door to the lodge. This was never done either.

To me, these real costs makes the K-7 estimate of $1.1 million highly questionable and underscores the need for two more bids from other reputable companies. Obviously, a critical fact here is that DW owners need to know exactly how much lodge expansion will cost and exactly how it will be paid for in order to intelligently vote on it.  Equally important is that we have to be sure that we need to expand the lodge in the first place.

After the Facilities Committee is done with their work, the Lodge Expansion matter will be turned over to the DW Budget & Finance Committee to work out how to pay for the project.  It appears financing can be obtained in a like manner as what was done in the Somersett/Private Golf Club matter. That is a bank loan at 5% for which $8.00 of our $ 80.00 monthly dues to Somersett goes to pay off.

There are two main options for financing.  The first would be to get a bank loan and then raise the DW monthly dues for the life of the loan.  At this time, an estimate in the increase in monthly dues is not available as there are simply too many “unknowns” and the DW B&F Committee has not dealt with this yet.    This option would cost more as there would be significant interest expense to pay over and above the estimated $ 1.1 million loan.    The second main option would be a one-time Special Assessment, possibly $1,000 – $1,300, on each Lot. Perhaps other means of financing will be looked into.

The next step before putting Lodge Expansion up for the all-owner vote would be to put Lodge Expansion on the agenda for Board approval.  At this time, the earliest estimate for completing all the necessary paperwork for board review is at a minimum a few months away with actual construction starting in the spring of 2017 as no one wants the work going on in the colder months.

To me, all this detailed work does not adequately address whether we actually need to expand the Lodge or seriously  examine other options such as more efficient use and scheduling of the facility we already have and as addressed in my Lodge Expansion Survey of a few weeks ago.  Since then, I have asked Karen Brown, DW Community Manager, for the attendance sheets we all sign at each event/activity to see exactly how many owners do attend them.  She is working on rounding up, assembling, and collating these sheets so I can see exactly how many people use the Lodge for each and every event, including the gym, pool, and the multi-purpose, and billiards rooms, etc.  When I get these and have analyzed them, I will email everyone an update as to what the facts show for attendance and what this information tells us about the real need for any Lodge Expansion.

From what I’ve been told the two main drivers of Lodge Expansion are not all owners being able to attend some events, e.g. the New Years Eve party.  Some have said why not two parties, one at an early time and one at a later time i.e. like staggered church services. How many stay till midnight? The other is the kitchen. Have you ever seen anyone doing any cooking in there? I see things being heated up and others placed temporarily in the refrigerator.

While the thrust for Expansion is focused on the large room, many owners agree that a larger office space is needed, along with a series of smaller rooms to be used by our various clubs and for small meetings. Do you know the Facilities Committee members meet in the Library all squished around a table?  This proposed lodge expansion for $ 1.1 million is for the expanding the main lodge room without any increase of office space.

There are some DW owners who sincerely believe that Lodge Expansion is worth it without knowing exactly what it will cost and how they will pay for it; or how disruptive it will be; and whether there will be enough parking; etc.; and there others who oppose it for these very same reasons and ultimately the majority vote will decide. And be aware, there are some whose objective is to steamroll lodge expansion through for their own agenda and this is simply not acceptable and not in the best interests of our DW community and all of us who live here.   For sure all DW owners need to have accurate and complete facts and drawings and cost figures in order to make their own most intelligent and best decision as the final vote to approve or reject lodge expansion will affect all DW owners on so many levels.

Feel free to respond to this update as your opinions and concerns do count and they should also count when it comes to addressing this matter at board meetings. Check the agendas and see you there.

Thanks, Michael Ferrell – Del Webb Owner

 

Sierra Canyon Construction Defects Settlement

somersett UnitedThe following memo from the law firm of Shinnick & Ryan NV P.C. was reportedly sent to many homeowners in Sierra Canyon with regard to a construction defect settlement against the builder, Pulte. Apparently this law suit (Reference: Second District Court, Case Number CV 12-02049) has been ongoing since the spring of 2012 and involves approximately 240 Sierra Canyon plaintiffs and 40 Contractors. Main defect is stucco, but many others from window, heating, plumbing, drywall, tile, roofing, electrical, shower doors and others.

Shinnick & Ryan Memo